Sunday, October 16, 2016

TGIF with Madhusudan Kela - Bloomberg Quint


by Agam Vakil Shraddha Babla
October 14, 2016, 8:48 pm


This week on Thank God It’s Friday, we spoke to well-known investor Madhusudan Kela, the chief investment strategist at Reliance Capital on what's in store for the Indian equity markets as earnings season picks up steam.

The Case For Equities

In one of your tweets you said “Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it...he who doesn’t..pays it. A powerful force as per Einstein.” What message do you have about people between ages 25 years and 35 years who only want to invest in debt, realty, and the likes?

The message is, first, you have to learn from history. First, you see what has happened to various asset classes in a 5-year, 10-year, 15-year, 20-year and 25-year time frame. And 25 years is a very large time frame. A lot of thing which you cannot imagine happen in a 25-year time frame. You’ve had the Iran-Iraq war, you’ve had Hurricane Katrina, you’ve had oil prices moving from $40 to $150, the 2008 crisis of the stock market, the Lehman crisis. So there are many events which happen. But the reality in spite of that, is equities have compounded at 15 percent plus in the last 25 years. Gold has compounded at less than around 8 percent and fixed income is 8-9 percent. And that’s what I meant, when I said ‘compounding at 15 percent’. Anyone who has a calculator must do this exercise. Just take Rs 100, compound it by 8 percent, compound it by 10 percent, compound it by 15 percent, compound it by 18 percent and then you see that it’s not a difference of 5 percent but a difference of crores of rupees, over a period of 25 years. I am saying that the case for equities is pretty simple – it is the only real asset which keeps earning. A good company, let’s say HDFC has kept compounding at 15-18 percent yearly. So every five years, my earnings double. If I buy gold, does it yield any return? If I take silver, does it yield any return? No. A lot of these assets are going up because of other reasons. But equities are an inherent earnings story. If you invest in a good company where earnings are growing 15-18 percent per year, I believe that kind of inherent return is possible to be made. The only catch is that most people end up asking the wrong questions about equities. So the question says “Main kya lelu?” (What stock should I buy?). People want a tip on what to buy and when to buy. That is not the answer. The answer lies in how much should I buy and for how long. Do I put 5 percent or 10 percent or 20 percent? Eventually people will have to realise that water will only flow where the slope is. So, the money will eventually come. It is a painful point for someone like me who has been preaching it for 25 years. In spite of that, the equity participation by local Indians is very low. It’s time that you do your homework daily. If you’re a young person who’s going to be alive for the next 30-40 years then it’s better to invest week by week. It’s not a big technical subject as people make it out to be. It is something which can be easily understood by any one and once you understand that, you have to ensure that you start from somewhere, be it 5 percent or 10 percent of your assets...you start investing. And over a period of time you discover yourself that it is a good investment.

Bottom-Up Approach To Stock-Picking
Then let us talk about some of your favourite stocks. Now some of your largest positions are in stocks like UPL, HCL Tech, Muthoot Finance, Divi’s Labs, United Spirits. Has there been any change in your holding/allocation to some of these stocks? Do you still like them at current valuations?

I will not comment on specific stocks due to compliance reasons. All our portfolios are disclosed every month. But we are bottom-up stock-pickers so from time to time we keep discovering new stocks and ideas and keep investing.

Let’s talk about sectors. In this list I do not see any metals or energy names which have done well in the recent past, whether you talk about steel companies or non-steel companies.

In our recent portfolio disclosure, you will see some of these names. If they have done well, then you will see them.

So you bought some of the energy stocks?

Yes, some of the metal companies, of course.

Pockets Of Value In NBFCs

The non-banking financial companies have been overvalued but this is one sector where there is a lot of growth. But within NBFCs, do you see a smaller theme where there is some value left?

I have spoken very publicly about it, that this is one sector where there is a lot of flexibility, the cost of funding is coming down. And they are far more agile, they are private owned, so the owners are sitting on top of the companies. So their ownership is very strong and I think some of these NBFCs will do very well in the longer term. So you cannot generalise that I will not buy this sector because some companies are trading at five to six times book value. Neither can you say that I will buy everything regardless of valuations. Selectively you have to be very sure and hold it for a longer period.

Within the NBFC space, what is your preference between say, housing finance companies or consumer credit or gold financing.

We have investments in gold finance companies, housing finance companies. We have investments in a consumer finance company as well. So what I am trying to say is its basically a bottom-up approach. If we like the valuation, if you like the promoter, then you buy it. So we are not saying that we are bullish on only one space. We are saying that we are bullish on the entire NBFC space. We should have an idea where we can put in the money.

‘IT Must Learn To Live With Low Growth Rates’
Coming to the IT industry, we hear the word disruption very often these days. At some point, your traditional businesses stop giving you the kind of growth which has been seen historically. What would you like to see in IT companies which you think can accelerate growth to the levels seen earlier.

I don’t know whether those growth rates are going to come back..the kind that we saw in previous years..30-35 percent kind of growth rate. It doesn’t look like those growth rates will come back, at least in the near future. Obviously five of these companies are also expanding. Managing 50,000 people and managing 3 lakh people are a very different ball game. Maybe a lot of the growth will come from products, maybe from technology disruption. So I do not think that those growth rates which you are talking about are possible at least in the near future. 

You have to live with low growth rates. Also to be fair, the valuations are also corrected for these companies.

'Money To Be Made In Select PSU Banks’
What is your view on the PSU banking space? If in the second quarter companies were to say that the pace of fresh addition of banks’ bad assets has stabilised, would that change your view on PSU banks.

I had said in February that the public sector banking space is looking interesting, and from that point, a lot of money has been made in the last 6 months. I still believe that you cannot generalise the entire sector. There are selective opportunities for investors who are willing to go that way because there is a lot of pessimism that’s been factored in. These banks have a lot of inherent advantages, a lot of assets which are not valued in the book, like their investments in real estate, their investments in life insurance companies, asset management companies. Some of them hold positions in the National Stock Exchange. So a lot of it is not reflected in their books. Bad loans are reflected in the book value; a lot of things are not reflected. So in due course, as it gets unlocked, and as the economy improves, let’s not forget that it is not the first time we are seeing this economy challenged. So today, normal gross non-performing liability ratio for the whole decade, is about 3 to 4 percent. Today, it has gone to 8 to 10 to 12 percent. This cannot be normalised. We are coming from a period of extreme challenge. So if you have a long-term view, which is what I have for my investments there is money to be made here.

But all the reasons you spoke about constitutes other income and are not related to their core lending operations. We are seeing that PSU banks have lost market share to private banks.

They might continue to lose some market share because that is again a reality. Some of them may not have enough capital to grow aggressively. Some of them may not have the management expertise which is required to grow in particular sectors. There are those challenges, but the size of the opportunities is large enough. In India, even in the NBFC space, the size of the opportunity is so large that selective people will be able to find customers. I think in 2 to 3 year time frame some of these factors will start playing out.

High Valuations In Low Interest Rate Environment
Shifting focus back to the global environment and low interest rates. Considering currently prevailing rates in the U.S., Germany and Japan, we are expecting money to flow into equities. Under these metrics, should we start getting used to high valuations in India?

Till the liquidity situation remains, not only in India but world-wide the metrics are changing. Which is why traditional investors are finding it extremely difficult to invest money. They are used to buying companies at price to earnings (PE) of 4 to 8 times. Now nothing is available and a lot of these companies are going at PE ratios of 25 to 35 times because of the extremely low interest rates in the world. It is very simple; I have the choice to put money in a bond or equity. A fifty-year bond in Switzerland is trading at negative interest rate which means a sure shot way to lose money in a fifty-year time frame is to go and buy this bond. Now if I have to invest in an FMCG company in India which can grow at even 5 percent per annum for the next 50 years and even if it has a 50 PE multiple, it might still make a justifiable case to invest in that company which has a 50 PE multiple versus investing in a Swiss bond. Which is why looking at it traditionally, when the interest rates were at 2 percent, I would have made a lot of money if I compounded my money at 2 percent for 50 years, but they have now gone negative. So valuations are never absolute and actually nothing in life is absolute. It is all relative. So equity valuations are to where bonds are trading.

The Lurking Risks
We are all assuming a very rosy picture for Indian equities but what could go wrong for the market, at least in the near to medium term, especially in the backdrop of global events?

Yes, there are many events. Lot of things can go wrong. Most of the times, many things go wrong which we can’t comprehend or anticipate...the ongoing geopolitical events, whether it is India-Pakistan or Syria or tensions between U.S and China, represents one risk. Secondly, this low interest rate environment itself will be a risk to the world at some point because of the deflation it is causing or can cause; interest rate cannot remain here forever. So whenever these interest rates go up, the central banks’ ability to pump in more money will be important. Third, specifically for India if there is a spurt in oil prices, it remains a key concern. So if it goes back to $70-80 or $100 per barrel it will be a risk factor, though I am not making a case that it will go there. Fourth, from a market perspective, we have had a case for earnings improvement for the last six quarters but it has not materialised. The market desperately needs earnings to catch up now. So its important for earnings to come through.

Rapid Fire

Your favourite business family in India – or any corporate group that you admire?
Divi’s Labs

Any other fund manager that you admire?
Julian Robertson (American billionaire former hedge fund manager)

Your investment guru or somebody who has inspired you?
Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

Your next best asset class after equities?
Real estate given the steep correction in some pockets.

Hillary or Trump – who do you wish to see as the next U.S. President?
It’s a million dollar question. I would not like to hazard a guess.

One favourite sector or theme that you think will become the next NBFC.
From a 5-10 year perspective, I think there is a lot of money in the travel and tourism industry which has not yet been discovered. We are all talking about consumption but the absolute market cap of this sector, including the hotel companies, is less than Rs 50,000 crore. I think there is some money to be made here.

Monday, October 3, 2016

IBM and Majesco form partnership to accelerate new insurance services on IBM Cloud


IBM and Majesco form partnership to accelerate new insurance services on IBM Cloud
NewsWire 
Published: October 3rd, 2016 - SD Times Newswire


IBM today announced a five-year partnership with Majesco, a global provider of core insurance software, consulting and services for insurance business transformation, to jointly offer a new cognitive, cloud-based platform to help insurance carriers worldwide create new services on IBM Cloud.

The global partnership is intended to speed the development of new customer services with predictive data analytics and help insurance providers bring new solutions to their clients. It also becomes the first in what is expected to be a wave of industry partnerships under IBM’s recently announced Industry Platforms business. The new unit was formed to build open industry platforms and the first comprehensive “as a service” solutions designed from the ground up for individual industries.

The joint IBM and Majesco offering will also provide a secure, global incubator for insurance companies to develop and launch new cognitive products and services via the cloud for clients.

Majesco operates in eight countries in all regions of the world, including North America, Europe, Middle East and Asia, and will contribute advanced software to this offering for property and casualty insurance, general liability insurance, life, annuity, pensions and insurance that improves speed to market, customer retention and business processes while responding to regulatory changes.

IBM will contribute Watson and other cognitive application programming interfaces (APIs) that will run on IBM Cloud. This will allow insurance companies to better analyze, price and understand business risks using new data sources and add an engaging and personalized advisory interface to their services. IBM continues to lay the foundation for the API economy by opening up new opportunities to create different kinds of business models via the cloud that can increase customer satisfaction through more personalized services and expanded partner networks – a catalyst for digital transformation.

According to industry experts, the insurance industry is facing multiple forces of change – rapid digitization, changing demographics, rising customer expectations, challenging economic environment and expanding risk of sophisticated fraud.

“The integration of IBM Cloud and cognitive capabilities with Majesco’s market-leading core system for policy, billing and claims will allow for new, innovative products and services for insurers,” said Ketan Mehta, Majesco CEO and co-founder. “This partnership underscores our commitment to accelerate new business services to our clients by providing them technology to transform their insurance business models.”

IBM Watson and other cognitive capabilities will also provide insurance underwriters and actuaries with improved insights into both customer and external data to help reduce risks from claim fraud, consolidate and streamline processes to improve pricing and increase the efficiency of underwriters. These advances can help to ultimately drive a more competitive insurance marketplace.

“IBM is making a strategic shift to unlock new value for clients through platform solutions — industry by industry — that combine IBM Cloud, our cognitive capabilities, new offerings we’re building and the specialized capabilities of ecosystems providers,”  said Bridget van Kralingen, senior vice president, IBM Industry Platforms. “Our insurance clients are facing huge pressures to modernize their business models, keep pace with the explosion of data, transactions, regulatory requirements, and new expectations for the experience of individuals. This partnership with Majesco will accelerate their digital transformations and allow them to discover new insight in the data flowing through their existing processes.”

With decades of industry expertise, IBM is a leader in providing solutions to the insurance industry. Currently, more than 85 percent of insurers ranked in the Global Fortune 500 rely on IBM technology, and another 89 of the top 100 insurers use IBM technology services to run their business.

IBM’s global cloud data center presence includes nearly 50 secure and highly scalable IBM Cloud datacenters in 18 countries on six continents. The company delivers enterprise cloud services ranging from analytics and Watson to Blockchain and the Internet of Things to provide clients with more choice and flexibility in their digital transformation.

Friday, September 30, 2016

Why private equity funds and banks are wooing former head honchos of India Inc to manage their investments

Why private equity funds and banks are wooing former head honchos of India Inc to manage their investments 


Snippet from the article

Shantanu Khosla, 56, on the other hand, was clueless about Advent International, a leading private equity group, and its India footprint when he agreed to meet the fund's India boss Shweta Jalan for coffee at Mumbai's Four Seasons in February of 2015. 

Khosla, a consummate Procter & Gamble (P&G) lifer and occupant of its India corner office for 13 long years, always believed that "there was no other organisation for him in India", but when he was offered a regional role, after 30 years in the same organisation, he did feel a tad restless and needed a new adrenaline rush. More importantly, he dreaded the prospect of leaving India. 

That's when his former vice chairman Werner Geissler got in touch and sounded him out on an exciting new opportunity that was brewing. Just a month before, Geissler had joined Advent's global operating partner programme to work closely with its consumer focus team to assist them with identifying attractive investment opportunities and, as appropriate, generating post-investment value in their global portfolio. In India, at that point, Advent was zeroing in on one of Gautam Thapar's crown jewels — Crompton Greaves' consumer business — to carve it out as an independent setup and the hunt was on for a maverick to team up and spearhead the company under its new private equity owners, drive change and revitalise operations. 

The first meeting was sheer happenstance. "We sold the entrepreneurial story. He (Khosla) would have the ability to build something which will be his legacy. It has an entire entrepreneurial challenge without taking equal bootstrapping risks of a startup that an entrepreneur undertakes," recalls Shweta Jalan, MD, Advent India PE Advisors. "CG was not a broken company. It had a strong brand, good distribution. We had to double down to focus on the business — things like supply chain, go to market strategy, brand and innovation, etc. It is really a journey from good to great." 

Nobody, not even Jalan's team members, believed Khosla would be convinced. But she persisted and, after a few meetings, Khosla was drawn to the idea of empowerment in a professionally run Crompton Consumer in its new avatar. "After working in an MNC for so long, I didn't want to spend the rest of my life in a family-owned set-up. If the demerger had fallen through, I would have been out of the door the next day," grins Khosla, MD, Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals. 

So from a matrix-driven global organisation to a domestic brand brimming with potential, Khosla was, by July, ready to switch shampoo and detergents for fans and lighting.

Monday, September 26, 2016

When stocks crash, should you buy them or sell them? - Rajeev Thakkar


Last Modified: Mon, Sep 26 2016. 09 31 AM IST

When stocks crash, should you buy them or sell them?

Would the fall of stick prices give the investors an opportunity to become rich or will the stock make the investor a Bill Miller

Rajeev Thakkar

Legends are made and careers are destroyed by large price movements in a stock over a short span of time.

Let us look at two examples.

One of the early successes of Warren Buffett was his investment in American Express in the mid-1960s. American Express was hit by a scandal, referred to as the Salad Oil Scandal, which caused its stock price to fall from $65 to $37. Buffett invested a massive 40% of his partnership assets in American Express and the rest, as they say, is history.

Bill Miller, a fund manager with an outstanding track record from 1991 to 2005, saw ‘opportunities’ in beaten-down stocks like AIG, Wachovia, Bear Stearns and Freddie Mac in 2008. He bought these stock when they fell significantly from the highs. And when they kept falling, he kept buying more of them. His 15-year track record got wiped out in a single year.

In India, we keep seeing such gyrations in various stocks and sectors, where individual stocks or sectors fall 50% and more from the highs. 

There could be various reasons for the fall.

Real estate or infrastructure stocks such as DLF, Unitech, GMR or GVK fall out of favour.

Stocks like Ranbaxy or Dr. Reddy’s correct on account of notices from the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA).

Stocks like Financial Technologies or MCX correct due to problems at National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL).

Nestle falls on account of suspected lead contamination of its noodles.

Welspun India falls on account of problems with its customer Target, a US retailer.

These are just illustrative examples and there are surely more instances of big falls in stock prices.

The question that arises is: what should be done? Is the fall giving an opportunity to become the next Warren Buffett or will the stock make the investor a Bill Miller?

Unless you own the stock, you are not forced to decide what to do with it. If you hold the stock, you are forced to choose between holding, buying more or selling the stock. If you do not own the stock and are not certain what to do, you can always look at other stocks.

UNDERSTAND THE PRICE MOVEMENTS

Just because a stock has fallen doesn’t mean it’s attractive. As a smart investor had pointed out, “A stock that falls 90% from peak is one which fell 80% and then halved further.” If you thought the stock was attractive just because it fell 80%, you could have lost 50% of your money buying it then.

Stock price movements are just that. Price movements. A company’s sales and profits do not depend on stock price movements. If on a fundamental business basis, the fall in stock prices is irrational, it may offer an attractive opportunity to buy the stock.

In order to arrive at a conclusion regarding a company, the following have to be satisfactorily answered.

Will the company survive a crisis? This was the difference between American Express and Lehman Brothers. The former survived while the latter did not. Sometimes the answer to the question is clear.

Whether it was about alleged lead residue in a brand of popular noodles, or pesticide in cold drinks or worms in chocolates, it was clear that once the respective company undertook remedial measures, the products would be back on the shelves, and that consumers loved the products.

On the other hand, where it is something like Winsome Diamonds or Kingfisher Airlines, where there are huge defaults to lenders and apparently hardly any assets, it is almost clear that the company will not survive.

Many a times there is uncertainty. Satyam Computers was such an example. Often it seems that the company may not survive whereas eventually it does.

As mentioned earlier, unless one is holding the stock, one is not forced to take any action.

If the answer is that the company will survive, the subsequent question is: will the customers come back?

Often, the answer depends on whether there was systemic wrongdoing by top managers or whether the company was a victim of external fraud or circumstances. Thus, a regular product recall (say, for a car) due to a faulty part is not as serious as, say, systematic cheating on pollution data by the car manufacturer.

Where the involvement of top management is established, it will help if there is a complete overhaul of the governance structures. Usually, customers and regulators are tolerant about genuine errors but crack down heavily on wilful wrongdoing.

In conclusion, a steep fall in a stock price is not a cause to blindly purchase a stock. Questions pertaining to survival and customer loyalty have to be clearly answered. For most investors, discretion may be the better part of valour.

Rajeev Thakkar, chief investment officer and director, PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Specialty Chemicals and diagnostics two mega trends for next 10 years: Ravi Dharamshi


Specialty Chemicals and diagnostics two mega trends for next 10 years: Ravi Dharamshi, ValueQuest Investment Advisors
By ET Now | Sep 15, 2016, 11.22 AM IST

n a chat with ET Now, Ravi Dharamshi, CIO, ValueQuest Investment Advisors, says India has about 3% market share of the specialty chemical industry which will go up to 4.5% market share in five years. We will still be a small fish in the overall scheme of things but that is a huge 50% growth for a sector. Edited excerpts


ET Now: What is your view on the pharmaceuticals sector?

Ravi Dharamshi: You cannot look at pharmaceuticals as a homogenous sector anymore. The various companies are going through their challenges and which company is where in terms of solving their challenges is going to determine whether you should be invested in that company or not.

So, if you have a company that has just passed through all the FDA issues and do not have any amount of unsustainable one-time earnings in their profit numbers, then I think that is a safe bet. The various leaders have been facing challenges because of that. The base generic portfolio in US has been facing pricing pressure for the last five-six months which is what is getting reflected and it could probably have to do with the US election cycle. We do not know for sure and if that is the case, then I think sooner or later, Indian generics are the lowest cost producers and they will be the last man's standing and we will gain market share for sure.

If India today would be at about roughly somewhere between 13% and 15% market share in US generics, this number is bound to up to 25% over the next 3-5 year period. Picking the right player is definitely more than 50% of making money in pharmaceuticals. I cannot make a blanket statement that this pharma is good or that pharma is bad. I have to be very picky and choosy about what I buy.

ET Now: Every time reboot happens in a sector, the big guys get better, the small players get weeded out. The example is Amazon survived the 2000 storm and is todaqy one of the biggest companies in the world. TCS, Wipro and Infosys survived the 2000 meltdown, today they are the big lead boys. Can a similar thing happen in pharma?

Ravi Dharamshi: First of all, I do not think that the challenges are as grave as the 2000 dot-com bubble was. So, yes.

ET Now: Survival of the fittest, let me put it this way.

Ravi Dharamshi: I feel majority of Indian companies will survive this phase. They will come out triumphant and as a country, India would have great built, great entry barriers because of this. We would have a base of intellectual property. We would have a base of regulatory and compliance standards which other countries will find difficult and, of course, the natural advantage that we have in terms of cost and people remains.

ET Now: Where are you picking your spots? Let us talk about two or three big trends then?

Ravi Dharamshi: Let us first talk about speciality chemicals. Now this is a jargon. Everything falls under chemicals. So first of all, from the morning that you get up to the time you go back to bed, every product that you use will have chemicals, even the food that you eat. So from toothpaste to whatever toiletries you use, everything will have chemicals. It is an all pervasive nature. Let me give you some startling statistics. So, the global chemical industry was about $3 trillion in 2001. It moved to $4.5 trillion. Now $4.5 trillion is way bigger than IT, way bigger than pharma and many other global sectors. $4.5 trillion and you cannot believe what the China size was. China was about $250 billion in 2001. It went to 1.5 trillion. So almost 80-90% of the incremental growth, China alone took away. So US, Europe have been losing market share and this sector though at aggregate level has been growing 15% so you can imagine the kind of business that has moved to China.

ET Now: And that will now move away from China?

Ravi Dharamshi: There are two-three things that have happened. One is Europe has implemented something called reach programme which means basically they want the chemical companies and their entire value chain to be certified and brought up to a certain level of compliance standards with environment. Second, China is facing pollution issues and third, we have become competitive vis-a-vis China and the fourth is we have a base of companies over here who can deliver to a little extent to the global demand.
ET Now: So that is a great point. First, there is size, then there is need, then there is efficiency.

Ravi Dharamshi: Yes and there are players who can address that need and so dyes and pigments is one area with speciality chemical where there has been tremendous problems in China. It is the most polluting industry and there are thousands of plants that have shut down. They are being incentivised and penalised. So overflow of that is coming to India. India has about 3% market share. We see that going to 4.5% market share in five years. We will still be a small fish in the overall scheme of things but that is a huge 50% growth for a sector. The companies can easily grow at the rate of 15% to 20% over the next 5-10 years. It is a huge good growth rate and a long run way that these companies have. And it does not matter what happens to the global liquidity flows, this trend is going to play out. We might have one year up and down but this is one particular, is an example of one trend that is definitely going to play out.

ET Now: So you like speciality chemical. Within speciality chemical, you like companies which are into the pigments and dye area?

Ravi Dharamshi: There are many companies and many areas that I like but dyes and pigments are the most immediate beneficiaries.

ET Now: Anything else you like in the speciality chemical?

Ravi Dharamshi: Agrochem is definitely one that we have been bullish on but we did not look at it as a speciality chemical initially, that is not... now that we understand that speciality agrochemicals also come under speciality chemicals. There are other niche areas. So the beauty of this space is that it is large but there are small-small niches. There are fragrance and flavours. There are surfactants. There are personal toiletries. There are many, many, many segments within which...

ET Now: It is not a complicated sector but?

Ravi Dharamshi: It is complicated until you uncomplicate it. You will have to go through the rigmarole of getting your hands dirty and understanding it a little bit and once that is developed, the nature of the business is quite uncomplicated.

ET Now: So according to you, there are world class opportunities and speciality chemical could be the next mega trend?

Ravi Dharamshi: It is the next 10-year trend for sure.

ET Now: Let us talk about the second mega trend and you like diagnostics, that is the buzz word and normally money is not made when you buy cheery consensus. If I look at the diagnostics sectors, three companies have just gone public and all of them are trading at PE multiples which are lofty in nature. Why do you like that sector?

Ravi Dharamshi: So it is a huge opportunity. First of all, I think it is about 37,000 crores if I have my numbers right. This is the size of the industry and the top four players combined have about Rs 2000 crore, top four-five players...

ET Now: Highly unorganised...

Ravi Dharamshi: So it is a very fragmented industry .

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Stock investing is not only about buying the right stock - S Naren


Stock investing is not only about buying the right stock
September 14, 2016, 8:12 AM IST

By S NAREN

Knowledge on the process of investing has been shaped over decades, through incisive communication by various thought leaders like Warren Buffett, Peter Lynch, James Montier, etc. On careful observation, it can be noticed that a lot of the investment theory is focussed on only one aspect of investing — buying, leaving behind the other two crucial aspects i.e. sizing (quantum of buying) and selling.

Aspect I: Buying

When it comes to picking stocks, as Peter Lynch puts it -there are five types of stocks — cyclicals, steady companies, companies based on trends, turnaround companies and asset backed companies. In my opinion, a beginner investor should keep away from both, turnaround and asset backed companies, since the quantum of knowledge required to take a call on either of the types of stocks is quite extensive. In comparison, it is relatively easier to spot companies which are cyclical, steady or are trend based.

Cyclicals: Many of the commodity-based sectors see cyclical trends as can be seen in metals, oil, shipping, sugar, commercial vehicles, capital goods etc. The point to remember while investing in these pockets is that there will be times when these companies will do very badly, which should be the ideal time to buy, and there will be times when these companies do very well, which are times to sell.
The key understanding here is the best time to buy a cyclical stock is when their share price is low and not when their earnings are high. For example, when sugar prices are at their bottom, sugar stocks will be at the bottom, but their valuation in terms of price to earnings, will be very costly.

So it is important to buy cyclicals based on share prices rather than earnings.

Steady Companies: In general, steady companies (consumer, pharma) are most suitable for investors who want steady returns. However, in the last few years, these companies have done well and therefore, as a mutual fund investor, we have been careful about such names, not because these companies are not steady, but because their stock prices are high. When the market was at its peak in 2007, these steady companies were low on valuation and presented an exceptional opportunity to invest.

Trend-based Companies: Trends, as Peter Lynch says, is one of the easiest for a lay investor to identify and invest in. It was very apparent in 2005 that people were moving towards mobile phones. As a result, it was apparent that ecommerce would gather pace.
Similarly, one of the big trends that occurred was that scooters were gaining at the expense of motor bikes in many parts of India. So, investing based on trends is easy for any layman who is able to observe these trends. Going forward, with improving penetration of health insurance and changing demographics, I believe healthcare (hospitals) as a trend provides a good long-term investment opportunity today.

Aspect II: Sizing

Once the stock to be added to the portfolio is decided, the next vital step is the quantum of buying or sizing; this is one of the least talked about areas of investing. When the amount to be invested is small, then Warren Buffett says, it is better to run a concentrated portfolio, something which he did in his initial years of investing. At the same time, one has to be aware that this form of portfolio requires doing better homework. The conviction and concentration of an investment should always be based on risk and potential upside seen.

Aspect III: Selling

What I learnt after a decade of being in investment management is — it is better to convert the word ‘selling’ to ‘switching’, because it is difficult to determine when to sell. If you view every selling decision as a switch and evaluate a switch, it is much easier to take a selling decision. This would ensure that one wouldn’t ruminate whether the selling decision happened at the right time or not.
Bubbles and Bursts In 2013,

In 2013, when Warren Buffett visited India, we got an opportunity to meet him as a part of a group. At that time, someone asked him what he learnt from his decades of investing; the answer presented an interesting insight. In his 6-7 decades of investing, he saw 6-7 bubbles and bursts. He alluded to this fact and said that what you do in a bubble and burst is the most important part of investing.

In India, there were stock market bubbles in 1992, 1994, 2000, 2007 and bursts in 1998, 2002, 2008. My experience has taught me that it is very important to be rational in both the situations as these are the opportunities to make sizeable long term money in the equity market. To sum up, investing is a very interesting area. If you enjoy it and make money, you should continue with it. If you enjoy it and lose money, invest into equities via a mutual fund. If you don’t enjoy investing, then too consider investing in a dynamic asset allocation fund today.

(Author is CIO, ICICI Prudential Asset Management)

Thursday, September 1, 2016

Things are looking up for Majesco


By Ranjit Shinde, ET Bureau | Sep 02, 2016, 08.19 AM IST

ET Intelligence Group: Majesco, a small-sized software solutions company carved out of Mumbai-based Mastek, has lost over 38 per cent on bourses since the beginning of 2016 on account of sluggish business momentum and lower operating margin. 

Its profitability was low since the company was investing to build capabilities for addressing the large insurance market in the US. However, the margin showed signs of revival in the June quarter. In addition, the company is expected to regain momentum in the second half of the fiscal. This may prompt long-term investors to use the stock's fall to make fresh purchases 

The US market contributes nearly 89 per cent to its revenues, while the UK generates 7 per cent of the revenue. The company caters to 164 clients in the property and casualty (P&C) and Life & annuity segments. P&C contributes 80 per cent of the revenue. 

Majesco's financial performance in the June quarter was marred by 1 per cent sequential drop in revenue at Rs 220 crore. On the positive side, the company was able to report operating profit of Rs 1.7 crore after reporting operating loss of Rs 1 crore in the previous quarter. In addition, its net profit was Rs 1.5 crore compared with the loss of Rs 2 crore in the March quarter. 

The company expects to clock revenue of $200-225 million by FY18 compared with $113 million in FY16. It also expects to improve operating margin before depreciation (EBITDA margin) substantially to 12-14 per cent from just over half a percent in FY16. 

Majesco's addressable US market size is pegged at over $4 billion reflecting a greater scope to ramp up busi ness. Also, the adoption of new technologies, including cloud, is rising among clients. Majesco currently earns over one-fifth of business by deploying cloud solutions. 

Since the company is in investment mode, its net profit is yet to reach its true potential. In such cases, the stock's valuation is based on revenue. Its current market cap is 1.5 times sales. Considering its revenue target for FY18, the valuation works out to be less than one. Its larger US peer, Guidewire Software trades at price-sales ratio of 11.8. This leaves a plenty of room for the stock to rise provided the company stays on track to meet targets. 

Stand-out stocks and stand-out companies seldom get noticed in troubled times. ET delves into financial performance of India Inc every week to identify stocks and companies that have bucked the trend to emerge stronger. 

This week, we present Majesco.